eLABa objektas:   "Administracinės atsakomybės instituto teisinio statuso problema, konstitucinės, baudžiamosios ir administracinės teisės požiūriu", 2007,D:20061229:114839-19199
E. dokumentai
ETD (LT)
visi dokumentai ...
URL nuoroda http://vddb.laba.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2007~D_20061229_114839-19199
Dokumentas Magistro darbas
Prieigos teisės Laikotarpiu nuo 2006-12-29 iki 9900-03-31 neprieinamas. Pasibaigus laikotarpiui bus prieinama laisvai.
Institucija Mykolo Romerio universitetas
Mokslo kryptis 01 S - Teisė
Atsakomybė Zikaitė, Jurgita - Magistro baigiamojo darbo autorius
Šedbaras, Stasys - Magistro baigiamojo darbo vertinimo komisijos narys
Urmonas, Algimantas - Magistro baigiamojo darbo vertinimo komisijos pirmininkas
Sabatauskas, Julius - Magistro baigiamojo darbo vertinimo komisijos narys
Šulija, Vytautas - Magistro baigiamojo darbo vertinimo komisijos narys
Kalesnykas, Raimundas - Magistro baigiamojo darbo vertinimo komisijos narys
Novikovas, Andriejus - Magistro baigiamojo darbo vertinimo komisijos narys
Dziegoraitis, Algimantas - Magistro baigiamojo darbo vertinimo komisijos narys
Mazaliauskienė, Ina - Magistro baigiamojo darbo vertinimo posėdžio sekretorius
Kalšnykas, Remigijus - Magistro baigiamojo darbo vadovas
Žilinskas, Dainius - Magistro baigiamojo darbo vertinimo komisijos narys
Kurpuvesas, Vytautas - Magistro baigiamojo darbo recenzentas
Mykolo Romerio universitetas - Mokslinį laipsnį teikianti institucija
Antraštė (-ės) Administracinės atsakomybės instituto teisinio statuso problema, konstitucinės, baudžiamosios ir administracinės teisės požiūriu
The legal status problem of the institute of administrative responsibility in terms of constitutional, criminal and administrative law
Santrauka [EN]

In his work, the author analyzes the legal status problems of the institute of administrative responsibility in terms of constitutional, criminal and administrative law.

First of all, the author analyzes the institute of administrative responsibility. To disclose the institute of administrative responsibility, firs of all, one needs to understand such terms as “social responsibility”, “legal responsibility”.

It is very important to mention, that there are lots of discussions in the academic literature about the extent of the legal responsibility. Many theorists don’t talk a lot about the regenerative legal positive responsibility. That’s why we have to turn back to the real source of the administrative responsibility. It means to the social responsibility. While concentrating only on the negative legal responsibility made theorists digress from the fundamental conception of the “social responsibility”. In this case, the author analyzes positive and negative administrative responsibility.

In his work, the author further studies the legal status problems of the institute of administrative responsibility in terms of constitutional law. To disclose these problems, one needs to study the interaction of the administrative responsibility and constitutional law.

Next the author analyzes the legal status problems of the institute of administrative responsibility in terms of criminal and administrative law. Especially, it is important to study the problems connected with human rights violations.

Finally, the author gives the conclusions and suggestions about more effective implementation and development of the institute of administrative responsibility in order to protect human rights from violations.

Raktažodžiai: social responsibility, criminal responsibility, legal responsibility, negatyvioji administracinė atsakomybė, baudžiamoji atsakomybė, the institute of administrative responsibility, administracinės atsakomybės institutas, positive administrative responsibility, negative administrative responsibility, socialinė atsakomybė, constitutional responsibility, pozityvioji administracinė atsakomybė, konstitucinė atsakomybė, teisinė atsakomybė